CVE-2026-43001

Published May 1, 2026

Last updated 21 days ago

CVSS high 7.9

Overview

Description
An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone 13 through 29. POST /v3/credentials did not validate that the caller-supplied project_id for an EC2-type credential matched the project of the authenticating application credential. This allowed an attacker holding an unrestricted application credential for project A to create an EC2 credential targeting project B; a subsequent /v3/ec2tokens exchange would then issue a Keystone token scoped to project B while still carrying the original app_cred_id, enabling cross-project lateral movement within the credential owner's role footprint.
Source
cve@mitre.org
NVD status
Analyzed
Products
keystone

Risk scores

CVSS 3.1

Type
Primary
Base score
8.5
Impact score
6
Exploitability score
1.8
Vector string
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Severity
HIGH

Weaknesses

cve@mitre.org
CWE-863

Social media

Hype score
Not currently trending

Configurations

Related CVEs

  1. Keystone is a content management system for Node.js. Prior to version 6.5.2, {field}.isFilterable access control can be bypassed in findMany queries by passing a cursor. This can be used to confirm the existence of records by protected field values. The fix for CVE-2025-46720 (field-level isFilterable bypass for update and delete mutations) added checks to the where parameter in update and delete mutations however the cursor parameter in findMany was not patched and accepts the same UniqueWhere input type. This issue has been patched in version 6.5.2.•CVE-2026-33326
  2. Keystone is a content management system for Node.js. Prior to version 6.5.0, `{field}.isFilterable` access control can be bypassed in `update` and `delete` mutations by adding additional unique filters. These filters can be used as an oracle to probe the existence or value of otherwise unreadable fields. Specifically, when a mutation includes a `where` clause with multiple unique filters (e.g. `id` and `email`), Keystone will attempt to match records even if filtering by the latter fields would normally be rejected by `field.isFilterable` or `list.defaultIsFilterable`. This can allow malicious actors to infer the presence of a particular field value when a filter is successful in returning a result. This affects any project relying on the default or dynamic `isFilterable` behavior (at the list or field level) to prevent external users from using the filtering of fields as a discovery mechanism. While this access control is respected during `findMany` operations, it was not completely enforced during `update` and `delete` mutations when accepting more than one unique `where` values in filters. This has no impact on projects using `isFilterable: false` or `defaultIsFilterable: false` for sensitive fields, or for those who have otherwise omitted filtering by these fields from their GraphQL schema. This issue has been patched in `@keystone-6/core` version 6.5.0. To mitigate this issue in older versions where patching is not a viable pathway, set `isFilterable: false` statically for relevant fields to prevent filtering by them earlier in the access control pipeline (that is, don't use functions); set `{field}.graphql.omit.read: true` for relevant fields, which implicitly removes filtering by these fields from the GraphQL schema; and/or deny `update` and `delete` operations for the relevant lists completely.•CVE-2025-46720
  3. KeystoneJS before 4.0.0-beta.7 allows application-wide CSRF bypass by removing the CSRF parameter and value, aka SecureLayer7 issue number SL7_KEYJS_03. In other words, it fails to reject requests that lack an x-csrf-token header.•CVE-2017-16570
  4. Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in KeystoneJS before 4.0.0-beta.7 allows remote authenticated administrators to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the "content brief" or "content extended" field, a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-15878.•CVE-2017-15881
  5. A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in fields/types/markdown/MarkdownType.js in KeystoneJS before 4.0.0-beta.7 via the Contact Us feature.•CVE-2017-15878

References

Sources include official advisories and independent security research.