Mobile device vulnerabilities

In add_attr of sdp_discovery.cc, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In updateState of ContentProtectionTogglePreferenceController.java, there is a possible way for a secondary user to disable the primary user's deceptive app scanning setting due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In CredentialManagerServiceStub of CredentialManagerService.java, there is a possible way to retrieve candidate credentials due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In smp_process_secure_connection_oob_data of smp_act.cc, there is a possible way to bypass SMP authentication due to Incorrect implementation of a protocol. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In clearAllowBgActivityStarts of PendingIntentRecord.java, there is a possible way for an application to launch an activity from the background due to BAL Bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In multiple locations, there is a possible way to persistently DoS the device due to a missing length check. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In getDestinationForApp of SpaAppBridgeActivity, there is a possible cross-user file reveal due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In collectOps of AppOpsService.java, there is a possible way to cause permanent DoS due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In startLockTaskMode of LockTaskController.java, there is a possible lock screen bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to physical escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.

In multiple locations, there is a possible Android/data access due to a path traversal error. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.

In validateIpConfiguration of WifiConfigurationUtil.java, there is a possible way to trigger a permanent DoS due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In BroadcastController.java of registerReceiverWithFeatureTraced, there is a possible way to receive broadcasts meant for the "android" package due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In multiple functions of RoleService.java, there is a possible permission squatting vulnerability due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege on versions of Android where android.permission.MANAGE_DEFAULT_APPLICATIONS was not defined with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In multiple functions of VpnManager.java, there is a possible cross-user data leak due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In dump of WindowManagerService.java, there is a possible way of running dumpsys without the required permission due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In multiple locations, there is a possible lock screen bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In multiple functions of GrantPermissionsActivity.java , there is a possible way to trick the user into granting the incorrect permission due to permission overload. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In onCreate of InstallStart.java, there is a possible permissions bypass due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.

In onCreate of UninstallerActivity.java, there is a possible way to uninstall a different user's app due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In multiple functions of UserController.java, there is a possible lock screen bypass due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In MMapVAccess of pmr_os.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In bta_av_config_ind of bta_av_aact.cc, there is a possible out of bounds read due to type confusion. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

Information disclosure

In lwis_top_register_io of lwis_device_top.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In draw_surface_image() of abl/android/lib/draw/draw.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege via USB fastboot, after a bootloader unlock, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.

In ConvertReductionOp of darwinn_mlir_converter_aidl.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In gxp_mapping_create of gxp_mapping.c, there is a possible privilege escalation due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In lwis_io_buffer_write, there is a possible OOB read/write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

WLAN in Android before 2025-09-05 on Google Pixel devices allows elevation of privilege, aka A-396458384.

WLAN in Android before 2025-09-05 on Google Pixel devices allows elevation of privilege, aka A-396462223.

In syna_cdev_ioctl_store_pid() of syna_tcm2_sysfs.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In lwis_test_register_io of lwis_device_test.c, there is a possible OOB Write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

There is a possible escalation of privilege due to test/debugging code left in a production build. This could lead to physical escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

There is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In unknown of cd_CnMsgCodecUserApi.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In wl_cfgscan_update_v3_schedscan_results() of wl_cfgscan.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

Information disclosure

Denial of service

Elevation of privilege

Elevation of Privilege

WLAN in Android before 2025-09-05 on Google Pixel devices allows elevation of privilege, aka A-394765106.

In TBD of TBD, there is a possible DoS due to a missing null check. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In ReadTachyonCommands of gxp_main_actor.cc, there is a possible information leak due to uninitialized data. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In wl_update_hidden_ap_ie() of wl_cfgscan.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

In SAEMM_DiscloseMsId of SAEMM_RadioMessageCodec.c, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote information disclosure post authentication with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

Insecure Storage of Sensitive Information in Secure Folder prior to Android 16 allows local attackers to access sensitive information.

Out-of-bounds write in libsavsvc.so prior to SMR Sep-2025 Release 1 allows local attackers to potentially execute arbitrary code.

Improper access control in ContactProvider prior to SMR Sep-2025 Release 1 allows local attackers to access sensitive information.

Improper access control in One UI Home prior to SMR Sep-2025 Release 1 allows physical attackers to bypass Kiosk mode under limited conditions.

Improper access control in ImsService prior to SMR Sep-2025 Release 1 allows local attackers to use the privileged APIs.