Mobile device vulnerabilities
Showing 751 - 800 of 4.3K CVEs
- CVE-2024-40664 Published Sep 4, 2025
In setupAccessibilityServices of AccessibilityFragment.java , there is a possible way to hide an enabled accessibility service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48581 Published Sep 4, 2025
In VerifyNoOverlapInSessions of apexd.cpp, there is a possible way to block security updates due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48563 Published Sep 4, 2025
In onNullBinding of RemoteFillService.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48562 Published Sep 4, 2025
In writeContent of RemotePrintDocument.java, there is a possible information disclosure due to a logic error. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48561 Published Sep 4, 2025
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to access data displayed on the screen due to side channel information disclosure. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48560 Published Sep 4, 2025
In AndroidManifest.xml, there is a possible way for an app to monitor motion events due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48559 Published Sep 4, 2025
In multiple functions of AppOpsService.java, there is a possible add a large amount of app ops due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48556 Published Sep 4, 2025
In multiple methods of NotificationChannel.java, there is a possible desynchronization from persistence due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48554 Published Sep 4, 2025
In handlePackagesChanged of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48553 Published Sep 4, 2025
In handlePackagesChanged of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible DoS of a device admin due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48552 Published Sep 4, 2025
In saveGlobalProxyLocked of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible way to desync from persistence due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48558 Published Sep 4, 2025
In multiple functions of BatteryService.java, there is a possible way to hijack implicit intent intended for system app due to Implicit intent hijacking. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48551 Published Sep 4, 2025
In multiple locations, there is a possible leak of an image across the Android User isolation boundary due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48550 Published Sep 4, 2025
In testGrantSlicePermission of SliceManagerTest.java, there is a possible permanent denial of service due to a path traversal error. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48549 Published Sep 4, 2025
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to record audio via a background app due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48548 Published Sep 4, 2025
In multiple functions of AppOpsControllerImpl.java, there is a possible way to record audio without displaying the privacy indicator due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48547 Published Sep 4, 2025
In multiple locations, there is a possible one-time permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48546 Published Sep 4, 2025
In checkPermissions of SafeActivityOptions.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48545 Published Sep 4, 2025
In isSystemUid of AccountManagerService.java, there is a possible way for an app to access privileged APIs due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local privilege escalation with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48544 Published Sep 4, 2025
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to read files belonging to other apps due to SQL injection. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48542 Published Sep 4, 2025
In multiple functions of AccountManagerService.java, there is a possible permanent denial of service due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48541 Published Sep 4, 2025
In onCreate of FaceSettings.java, there is a possible way to remove biometric unlock across user profiles due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48540 Published Sep 4, 2025
In processTransactInternal of RpcState.cpp, there is a possible local out of memory write due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48538 Published Sep 4, 2025
In setApplicationHiddenSettingAsUser of PackageManagerService.java, there is a possible way to hide a system critical package due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48539 Published Sep 4, 2025
In SendPacketToPeer of acl_arbiter.cc, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a use after free. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48543 Published Sep 4, 2025
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to escape chrome sandbox to attack android system_server due to a use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48531 Published Sep 4, 2025
In getCallingPackageName of CredentialStorage, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48532 Published Sep 4, 2025
In markMediaAsFavorite of MediaProvider.java, there is a possible way to bypass the WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE permission due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48537 Published Sep 4, 2025
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to persistently DoS the device due to improper input validation. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48535 Published Sep 4, 2025
In assertSafeToStartCustomActivity of AppRestrictionsFragment.java , there is a possible way to exploit a parcel mismatch resulting in a launch anywhere vulnerability due to unsafe deserialization. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48534 Published Sep 4, 2025
In getDefaultCBRPackageName of CellBroadcastHandler.java, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48533 Published Sep 4, 2025
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to use apps linked from a context menu of a lockscreen app due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48523 Published Sep 4, 2025
In onCreate of SelectAccountActivity.java, there is a possible way to add contacts without permission due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48528 Published Sep 4, 2025
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to overlay biometrics due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48527 Published Sep 4, 2025
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to leak hidden work profile notifications due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48526 Published Sep 4, 2025
In createMultiProfilePagerAdapter of ChooserActivity.java , there is a possible way for an app to launch the ChooserActivity in another profile due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48524 Published Sep 4, 2025
In isSystem of WifiPermissionsUtil.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48529 Published Sep 4, 2025
In setRingtoneUri of VoicemailNotificationSettingsUtil.java , there is a possible cross user data leak due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48530 Published Sep 4, 2025
In multiple locations, there is a possible condition that results in OOB accesses due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution in combination with other bugs, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-32347 Published Sep 4, 2025
In onStart of BiometricEnrollIntroduction.java, there is a possible way to determine the device's location due to an unsafe PendingIntent. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-32345 Published Sep 4, 2025
In updateState of ContentProtectionTogglePreferenceController.java, there is a possible way for a secondary user to disable the primary user's deceptive app scanning setting due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-48522 Published Sep 4, 2025
In setDisplayName of AssociationRequest.java, there is a possible way for an app to retain CDM association due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-32350 Published Sep 4, 2025
In maybeShowDialog of ControlsSettingsDialogManager.kt, there is a possible overlay of the ControlsSettingsDialog due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-32349 Published Sep 4, 2025
In multiple locations, there is a possible privilege escalation due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-32346 Published Sep 4, 2025
In onActivityResult of VoicemailSettingsActivity.java, there is a possible work profile contact number leak due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-32333 Published Sep 4, 2025
In startSpaActivityForApp of SpaActivity.kt, there is a possible cross-user permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-32332 Published Sep 4, 2025
In multiple locations, there is a possible memory corruption due to a use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-32331 Published Sep 4, 2025
In showDismissibleKeyguard of KeyguardService.java, there is a possible way to bypass app pinning due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-32330 Published Sep 4, 2025
In generateRandomPassword of LocalBluetoothLeBroadcast.java, there is a possible way to intercept the Auracast audio stream due to an insecure default value. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-32327 Published Sep 4, 2025
In multiple functions of PickerDbFacade.java, there is a possible unauthorized data access due to SQL injection. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
In setupAccessibilityServices of AccessibilityFragment.java , there is a possible way to hide an enabled accessibility service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
medium 6.2
In VerifyNoOverlapInSessions of apexd.cpp, there is a possible way to block security updates due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 8.4
In onNullBinding of RemoteFillService.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In writeContent of RemotePrintDocument.java, there is a possible information disclosure due to a logic error. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
medium 5.0
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to access data displayed on the screen due to side channel information disclosure. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
medium 5.5
In AndroidManifest.xml, there is a possible way for an app to monitor motion events due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
medium 5.5
In multiple functions of AppOpsService.java, there is a possible add a large amount of app ops due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
medium 5.5
In multiple methods of NotificationChannel.java, there is a possible desynchronization from persistence due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
high 7.3
In handlePackagesChanged of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
medium 6.1
In handlePackagesChanged of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible DoS of a device admin due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In saveGlobalProxyLocked of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible way to desync from persistence due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In multiple functions of BatteryService.java, there is a possible way to hijack implicit intent intended for system app due to Implicit intent hijacking. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In multiple locations, there is a possible leak of an image across the Android User isolation boundary due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
medium 5.0
In testGrantSlicePermission of SliceManagerTest.java, there is a possible permanent denial of service due to a path traversal error. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
medium 5.5
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to record audio via a background app due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In multiple functions of AppOpsControllerImpl.java, there is a possible way to record audio without displaying the privacy indicator due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
high 7.3
In multiple locations, there is a possible one-time permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
high 7.3
In checkPermissions of SafeActivityOptions.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In isSystemUid of AccountManagerService.java, there is a possible way for an app to access privileged APIs due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local privilege escalation with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
medium 5.5
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to read files belonging to other apps due to SQL injection. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In multiple functions of AccountManagerService.java, there is a possible permanent denial of service due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
medium 5.5
In onCreate of FaceSettings.java, there is a possible way to remove biometric unlock across user profiles due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In processTransactInternal of RpcState.cpp, there is a possible local out of memory write due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In setApplicationHiddenSettingAsUser of PackageManagerService.java, there is a possible way to hide a system critical package due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
medium 5.5
In SendPacketToPeer of acl_arbiter.cc, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a use after free. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 8.0
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to escape chrome sandbox to attack android system_server due to a use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 8.8
In getCallingPackageName of CredentialStorage, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In markMediaAsFavorite of MediaProvider.java, there is a possible way to bypass the WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE permission due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
high 7.3
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to persistently DoS the device due to improper input validation. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.1
In assertSafeToStartCustomActivity of AppRestrictionsFragment.java , there is a possible way to exploit a parcel mismatch resulting in a launch anywhere vulnerability due to unsafe deserialization. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In getDefaultCBRPackageName of CellBroadcastHandler.java, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 8.8
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to use apps linked from a context menu of a lockscreen app due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.0
In onCreate of SelectAccountActivity.java, there is a possible way to add contacts without permission due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to overlay biometrics due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
medium 4.0
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to leak hidden work profile notifications due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
medium 6.2
In createMultiProfilePagerAdapter of ChooserActivity.java , there is a possible way for an app to launch the ChooserActivity in another profile due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
medium 4.0
In isSystem of WifiPermissionsUtil.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
medium 5.5
In setRingtoneUri of VoicemailNotificationSettingsUtil.java , there is a possible cross user data leak due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
medium 5.5
In multiple locations, there is a possible condition that results in OOB accesses due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution in combination with other bugs, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 8.1
In onStart of BiometricEnrollIntroduction.java, there is a possible way to determine the device's location due to an unsafe PendingIntent. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In updateState of ContentProtectionTogglePreferenceController.java, there is a possible way for a secondary user to disable the primary user's deceptive app scanning setting due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In setDisplayName of AssociationRequest.java, there is a possible way for an app to retain CDM association due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In maybeShowDialog of ControlsSettingsDialogManager.kt, there is a possible overlay of the ControlsSettingsDialog due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In multiple locations, there is a possible privilege escalation due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In onActivityResult of VoicemailSettingsActivity.java, there is a possible work profile contact number leak due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In startSpaActivityForApp of SpaActivity.kt, there is a possible cross-user permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In multiple locations, there is a possible memory corruption due to a use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In showDismissibleKeyguard of KeyguardService.java, there is a possible way to bypass app pinning due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In generateRandomPassword of LocalBluetoothLeBroadcast.java, there is a possible way to intercept the Auracast audio stream due to an insecure default value. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
medium 5.7
In multiple functions of PickerDbFacade.java, there is a possible unauthorized data access due to SQL injection. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8