Mobile device vulnerabilities
Showing 51 - 100 of 4.3K CVEs
- CVE-2026-0165 Published Jun 16, 2026
In several functions of the RTCP packet decoder, there is a possible out-of-bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0164 Published Jun 16, 2026
In Modem, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0162 Published Jun 16, 2026
In ParsePayloads of AudioSdpParser.cpp, there is a possible memory corruption due to type confusion. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0161 Published Jun 16, 2026
In numberOfReportBlocks of RtpSession.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0160 Published Jun 16, 2026
In TextRtpPayloadDecoderNode::DecodeT140 of TextRtpPayloadDecoderNode.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0158 Published Jun 16, 2026
In Camera, there is a possible unauthorized way to access photos due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0157 Published Jun 16, 2026
In RtcpHeader::decodeRtcpHeader, there is a possible OOB read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0156 Published Jun 16, 2026
In checkSsrcCollisionOnRcv of RtpSession.cpp, there is a possible memory safety issue due to a missing null check. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0155 Published Jun 16, 2026
In ImsMediaBitReader::ReadByteBuffer, there is a possible OOB read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0154 Published Jun 16, 2026
In Modem, there is a possible way to trigger a modem crash during a SIP REFER request due to memory corruption. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0153 Published Jun 16, 2026
In Write of msg_to_host_buffer.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0152 Published Jun 16, 2026
In OSMMapPMRGeneric of pmr_os.c, there is a possible way to leverage a system call to system call to maliciously expand the VMA out of bounds due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0128 Published Jun 16, 2026
In RtcpFbPacket::decodeRtcpFbPacket, there is a possible out of bounds read due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0126 Published Jun 16, 2026
In WC-Radio, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2025-46308 Published Jun 11, 2026
An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 18.4 and iPadOS 18.4, macOS Sequoia 15.4. An app may be able to leak sensitive user information.
- CVE-2026-50751 Published Jun 8, 2026
A logic flow weakness in Remote Access and Mobile Access certificate validation in deprecated IKEv1 key exchange allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass user authentication and establish a remote access VPN connection without a valid user password.
- CVE-2026-21031 Published Jun 5, 2026
Improper authorization in AppBlock prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attacker to launch arbitrary activity. User interaction is required for triggering this vulnerability.
- CVE-2026-21030 Published Jun 5, 2026
Improper access control in MediaTek Audio HAL prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to trigger privileged functions.
- CVE-2026-21029 Published Jun 5, 2026
Improper export of android application components in Galaxy Editing Service prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attacker to execute privileged operations.
- CVE-2026-21028 Published Jun 5, 2026
Improper access control in AuditLogService prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to access sensitive information.
- CVE-2026-21027 Published Jun 5, 2026
Improper export of android application components in ImsSettings prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to trigger logging function.
- CVE-2026-21026 Published Jun 5, 2026
Improper export of android application components in SpriteWallpaper prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to access to sensitive information.
- CVE-2026-21025 Published Jun 5, 2026
Incorrect privilege assignment in Telephony prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to access sensitive information.
- CVE-2026-21017 Published Jun 5, 2026
Improper handling of insufficient privileges in SecTelephonyProvider prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to access privileged files.
- CVE-2026-28586 Published Jun 1, 2026
In multiple functions of AppOpsService.java, there is a possible missing permission check due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-28581 Published Jun 1, 2026
In fixInitiatingUserIfNecessary of CallIntentProcessor.java, there is a possible way to make an emergency call due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local with null execution privileges needed. User interaction is null for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-28580 Published Jun 1, 2026
In multiple functions, there is a possible desync in persistence due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-28578 Published Jun 1, 2026
In multiple functions of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible desync from persistence due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-28577 Published Jun 1, 2026
In addWindow of WindowManagerService.java, there is a possible tapjacking issue due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0100 Published Jun 1, 2026
In Load of LoadedArsc.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0099 Published Jun 1, 2026
In onNullBinding of HostEmulationManager.java, there is a possible way to launch an activity from the background due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0098 Published Jun 1, 2026
In getCallingPackageName of Shared.java, there is a possible way to bypass activity start restrictions due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0097 Published Jun 1, 2026
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to bypass user interaction when pairing an LE device due to a logic error. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0096 Published Jun 1, 2026
In getAppLabel of ForgetDeviceDialogFragment.java, there is a possible trick the user into forgetting a device due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0095 Published Jun 1, 2026
In l2c_fcr_clone_buf of l2c_fcr.cc, there is a possible way to trigger controlled heap corruption within the privileged Bluetooth process due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0094 Published Jun 1, 2026
In getApplicationLabel of KeyChainActivity.java, there is a possible way to trick the user into approving access to certificates due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0093 Published Jun 1, 2026
In multiple locations, there is a possible misleading UI due to obfuscation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0091 Published Jun 1, 2026
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to execute code in the launcher process due to an over-privileged shell user. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0089 Published Jun 1, 2026
In multiple functions of PackageInstallerService.java, there is a possible way to install unverified apps due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0088 Published Jun 1, 2026
In getCallingAppLabel of CertInstaller.java, there is a possible way to hide a sensitive security dialogue due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0087 Published Jun 1, 2026
In approvalLevelForDomainInternal of DomainVerificationService.java, there is a possible way to hijack an arbitrary app link due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0086 Published Jun 1, 2026
In onCreate of DisableSupervisionActivity.kt, there is a possible way to delete supervision data due to a missing null check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0085 Published Jun 1, 2026
In applySimpleFieldMaxSize of DataRowHandler.java, there is a possible way to insert a large contact name due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0080 Published Jun 1, 2026
In multiple functions of ubsan_throwing_runtime.cpp, there is a possible way to cause a crash due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0079 Published Jun 1, 2026
In multiple functions of ubsan_throwing_runtime.cpp, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0078 Published Jun 1, 2026
In setGlobalProxy of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible desync in persistence due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0077 Published Jun 1, 2026
In resumeConfigurationDispatch of ActivityRecord.java, there is a possible background application launch (bal) due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0076 Published Jun 1, 2026
In validateNode of ResourceTypes.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds read due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0075 Published Jun 1, 2026
In multiple functions, there is a possible way to access the contacts database due to a SQL injection. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- CVE-2026-0074 Published Jun 1, 2026
In getPreferredSize of LauncherProcessImageListener.kt, there is a possible denial of service due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
In several functions of the RTCP packet decoder, there is a possible out-of-bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
medium 5.7
In Modem, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 8.8
In ParsePayloads of AudioSdpParser.cpp, there is a possible memory corruption due to type confusion. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 8.8
In numberOfReportBlocks of RtpSession.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 8.8
In TextRtpPayloadDecoderNode::DecodeT140 of TextRtpPayloadDecoderNode.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 8.8
In Camera, there is a possible unauthorized way to access photos due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
low 3.3
In RtcpHeader::decodeRtcpHeader, there is a possible OOB read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
medium 4.3
In checkSsrcCollisionOnRcv of RtpSession.cpp, there is a possible memory safety issue due to a missing null check. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.5
In ImsMediaBitReader::ReadByteBuffer, there is a possible OOB read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
medium 4.3
In Modem, there is a possible way to trigger a modem crash during a SIP REFER request due to memory corruption. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 8.8
In Write of msg_to_host_buffer.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In OSMMapPMRGeneric of pmr_os.c, there is a possible way to leverage a system call to system call to maliciously expand the VMA out of bounds due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In RtcpFbPacket::decodeRtcpFbPacket, there is a possible out of bounds read due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
medium 6.5
In WC-Radio, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
critical 9.8
An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 18.4 and iPadOS 18.4, macOS Sequoia 15.4. An app may be able to leak sensitive user information.
medium 5.3
A logic flow weakness in Remote Access and Mobile Access certificate validation in deprecated IKEv1 key exchange allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass user authentication and establish a remote access VPN connection without a valid user password.
critical 9.3
Improper authorization in AppBlock prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attacker to launch arbitrary activity. User interaction is required for triggering this vulnerability.
medium 5.2
Improper access control in MediaTek Audio HAL prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to trigger privileged functions.
medium 6.4
Improper export of android application components in Galaxy Editing Service prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attacker to execute privileged operations.
medium 6.8
Improper access control in AuditLogService prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to access sensitive information.
medium 5.1
Improper export of android application components in ImsSettings prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to trigger logging function.
medium 4.8
Improper export of android application components in SpriteWallpaper prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to access to sensitive information.
medium 6.4
Incorrect privilege assignment in Telephony prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to access sensitive information.
medium 6.9
Improper handling of insufficient privileges in SecTelephonyProvider prior to SMR Jun-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to access privileged files.
medium 4.6
In multiple functions of AppOpsService.java, there is a possible missing permission check due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
low 3.3
In fixInitiatingUserIfNecessary of CallIntentProcessor.java, there is a possible way to make an emergency call due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local with null execution privileges needed. User interaction is null for exploitation.
medium 4.0
In multiple functions, there is a possible desync in persistence due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In multiple functions of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible desync from persistence due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
medium 5.5
In addWindow of WindowManagerService.java, there is a possible tapjacking issue due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In Load of LoadedArsc.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In onNullBinding of HostEmulationManager.java, there is a possible way to launch an activity from the background due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In getCallingPackageName of Shared.java, there is a possible way to bypass activity start restrictions due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to bypass user interaction when pairing an LE device due to a logic error. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 8.0
In getAppLabel of ForgetDeviceDialogFragment.java, there is a possible trick the user into forgetting a device due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In l2c_fcr_clone_buf of l2c_fcr.cc, there is a possible way to trigger controlled heap corruption within the privileged Bluetooth process due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 8.0
In getApplicationLabel of KeyChainActivity.java, there is a possible way to trick the user into approving access to certificates due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In multiple locations, there is a possible misleading UI due to obfuscation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to execute code in the launcher process due to an over-privileged shell user. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In multiple functions of PackageInstallerService.java, there is a possible way to install unverified apps due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In getCallingAppLabel of CertInstaller.java, there is a possible way to hide a sensitive security dialogue due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In approvalLevelForDomainInternal of DomainVerificationService.java, there is a possible way to hijack an arbitrary app link due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In onCreate of DisableSupervisionActivity.kt, there is a possible way to delete supervision data due to a missing null check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
medium 6.8
In applySimpleFieldMaxSize of DataRowHandler.java, there is a possible way to insert a large contact name due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
medium 5.5
In multiple functions of ubsan_throwing_runtime.cpp, there is a possible way to cause a crash due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
medium 6.5
In multiple functions of ubsan_throwing_runtime.cpp, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
medium 5.5
In setGlobalProxy of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible desync in persistence due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In resumeConfigurationDispatch of ActivityRecord.java, there is a possible background application launch (bal) due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In validateNode of ResourceTypes.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds read due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
high 7.8
In multiple functions, there is a possible way to access the contacts database due to a SQL injection. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
medium 5.9
In getPreferredSize of LauncherProcessImageListener.kt, there is a possible denial of service due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
medium 5.5